Sunday, November 21, 2010

Selling Klonopin Price

Call Meeting / Plenary 11/27/1910

Call / Press Release
appreciate your dissemination
20/11 / 2010
Meeting / Whole

FOR THE RIGHT TO LIVE IN THE CITY
against evictions
Occupy - Build - Resist

Saturday 27 November 10 am (Spot)
JB Alberdi 5250 CABA

Agenda

• Political Situation.
• Report on Emergency and Evictions.
• Area Housing Project.
• report with the IVC. • Plan to Combat
.


Our program:
• No Evictions their immediate suspension.
• No sale of land to the IVC
• If the construction of housing.
• For permanent housing solution. • By a law
Emergency Housing program and budget with real.
• Housing plans that addresses the demand for the homeless in the city to control and participation of the inhabitants.
• IVC Increased Budget for the construction of social housing.
• real program of transitional housing to permanent housing.
• Implementation of a real Estate Bank with recovery of idle land and real estate.
• Housing Tax idle.
• social rental, which does not exceed 20% of household income, with state guarantee.
• Private Emergency Villas for all its inhabitants.
• No more men, women and children living on the streets.
• No to "Winter Plan."

Press Contacts: Jorge
15-5114-7375 / 15-6321-9797 Cesar / Sergio 15-5771-3018 / 15-6982-7001 Pipa

Meeting for the Right to Live in the City
porelderechoavivirenlaciudad @ yahoo . com.ar
Call

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Tamoxifen More Drug_warnings_recalls

Judgement in case of forced disappearance of Edgar Fernando García

The maximum penalty 40 years imprisonment, were sentenced on October 28 the two former agents of the former National Police (PN), Hector Ramirez Rios and Abraham Lancerio Gomez for the 8th Court of Criminal Sentencing City Guatemala. Both were found liable for the forced disappearance of union leader and student Edgar Fernando García, a crime committed over 26 years. This is the third sentence in Guatemala for the crime of enforced disappearance and the first based on the Archives of the National Police (AHPN) [1] in the 14 years since the signing of the peace. In mid 2009 he was sentenced the former military commissioner, Felipe Cusanero Coj to 150 years for the disappearance of six people in the community Choatalum , and late same year was sentenced to four people (including Colonel Marco Antonio Sánchez Samayoa) to 53 years and 4 months imprisonment each for the disappearance of eight people in El Jute . Both cases were accompanied by Acoguate, who also noted the hearing in the case of Edgar Fernando García.

"The crime of enforced disappearance is a cruel fact that must not go unpunished"

Defendants for the detention and disappearance of Edgar Fernando García were acquitted of two counts because of the time prescription, despite having been found guilty: specific aggravated unlawful detention, so that the Public Ministry (MP) called 3 1 years, and abuse of authority, as requested 3 years. The MP also called for a penalty of 15 years in prison for the crime of kidnapping, but the court did not classify this as such by law because the documentary evidence and testimony showed that order for his arrest and disappearance was to obtain information from their political work, according to the doctrine of security prevailing in the country, and not otherwise.

The disappearance by itself was accepted to be a permanent and inalienable crime, ie crime committed while the prisoner is gone does not appear [2] , which is the case of Edgar Fernando García. The penalty, the court explained, must be proportionate to the offense for which issued the maximum penalty 40 years imprisonment, taking into account that: the victim was a student, the motive for the crime was political, the intensity of damage caused to their families and Guatemalan society has endured for more than 25 years, forced disappearance is a cruel fact that you can not go unpunished and that the family and the nation are entitled to the truth.

Documentos del AHPN fueron clasificados como evidencia

El tribunal dio valor probatorio a todos los testimonios de los testigos, por la espontaneidad de estos y la congruencia entre sí. También dio valor probatorio a los informes de los peritos y a los documentos presentados del AHPN y del Diario Militar, así como a los recortes de prensa, programa de televisión acerca del Diario Militar y el audio con la declaración de Danilo Chinchilla, compañero de Fernando García con quien se encontrara en el momento de su detención, en el que contó que a Fernando García lo habían llevado agentes de la Brigada de Operaciones Especiales de la PN (BROE) en un vehículo.

The experts based their report largely on an analysis of 667 documents for the first time AHPN has been used as evidence in legal proceedings to clarify the responsibility in a case of enforced disappearance. To complement and contrast the information obtained and provided the evidence that was used declassified Military Journal, a document that can be read for example that only between 1983 and 1985 the State Security Forces conducted 188 disappearances.

According to various surveys and documents, it stated that the reason for the disappearance of Edgar Fernando García was political and that their activities policies (in the underground as the Guatemalan Workers Party Central Committee member), student and trade union was considered the internal enemy. The key document was one in which the head closest of the two accused officials proposed the award, which motivated the transaction in the place, date and time Danilo Chinchilla said they had arrested Edgar Fernando García. They are also accused in this case two more agents (Alfonso Guillermo Leon and Hugo Rolando Osorio Gomez) who are currently fugitives from justice.

sufficient evidence for conviction

The court stated that, according to witnesses and experts, and a number of documents AHPN, Edgar Fernando García was arrested by men in civilian clothes on 18 February 1984 when he was, along with fellow Danilo Chinchilla Party at the intersection of 7th Street and 3rd Avenue in Zone 11, near the market called the store. Both tried to flee but the police opened fire injuring a hip Danilo Chinchilla, who later moved to Roosevelt Hospital, while Edgar Fernando García him into custody, according to Danilo Chinchilla told in a recording made, having been rescued from the hospital.

Ninth Montenegro, wife of Edgar Fernando García, said in his testimony that day her husband had left home early and that she refused the keys to his vehicle, he needed to find his touch, for fear something happened to him. That night men came to her home in civilian clothes, who told him not to worry, they had her husband, who were friends of him and would return that Tuesday. Never saw him again.

PN operated in conjunction with Army Intelligence and

Both the Public Ministry (MP) as the Attorney Human Rights (PDH), a complainant, emphasized the state's responsibility in the disappearance of Edgar Fernando García, as well as the thousands of students and unionists, mainly between 1978 and 1984. Specifically, between 10 February and 11 March 1984 took place in Guatemala City called Operation Clean 84, a joint venture between the National Police, the intelligence service and army of Guatemala, after training ( 30/1-8/2) duly documented in the AHPN, and which includes the participation of the accused as part of the IV Corps of the then PN.

Discussion oral groups, which lasted five days, aroused great interest of national and foreign. MP members were present, the PDH, GAM (Mutual Support Group) and FAMDEGUA, plus AHPN employees, representatives of the diplomatic corps in Canada, Switzerland, Sweden and the United States, among others, and staff of the Office the High Commissioner for Human Rights UN Guatemala.

Judgement is just one step in the dignity of victims of enforced disappearance

To Aura Elena Farfán, FAMDEGUA, this statement is definitely a step in seeking justice, but only a halfway step "because it believes that" has not yet reached the masterminds and has ensured that claimed they did with the missing "since that "while not knowing what they did with their relatives still waiting to hear" and "help to at least say where they were left or who were served."

Regarding MP's request the court to open proceedings against the police chiefs and army as responsible for this and other disappearances, the court granted this request clarifying it is up to the MP to investigate and follow due process.

Mario Polanco, director of GAM, he believes that "this sentence is an important fact in the fight against impunity and when the sentence is hereby granted the law firm for cases of enforced disappearance." GAM is committed to bring to court 102 cases of enforced disappearance, the first two processes will begin in the coming months.


[1] AHPN was discovered by accident in July 2005 when the PDH was tasked to inspect a building in the complex of the Civil National Police after an explosion in the vicinity. This file consists of some 80 million documents, a large number dating from the time of armed conflict, in which are numerous documented human rights violations, but police had previously denied its existence. When they discovered the contents of the file, raised hopes in the relatives of missing persons to clarify what happened to their relatives. This trial is the first in which part of this file has served to highlight the responsibility of the two officers now convicted of a crime against humanity.

This file will be an important tool to work against impunity because it displayed documents showing among other things, the structure of National Police (PN) and its work with the intelligence and the Army of Guatemala in the fight counterinsurgency was conducted during the years of internal armed conflict meant the disappearance of about 45 thousand Guatemalans. It also listed names of those involved in specific operations, who gave the orders, who were made up, etc. as is the case of illegal detention of Fernando Garcia.

[2] In a decision of the Constitutional Court in July 2009 ( www.caldh.org / desaparicionforzada.pdf ), recognized the disappearance as a continuing crime of limitations.

BY: ACOGUATE

PHOTO: Edgar Fernando García, courtesy of GAM

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Homebuilt Airplane Store Wing

Preliminary observations of the UN Special Rapporteur on situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous peoples

James Anaya, Special Rapporteur of the United Nations Organization [1] , visit to Guatemala from 14 to 18 June, visited several regions of the country affected by mining, which accompanies ACOGUATE defenders committed human rights-as in the defense of natural resources and territory. His mission was to assess the situation of indigenous peoples, especially about land rights and consulting [2] , and the criminalization of the struggles and demands of communities, with particular attention to the case of the Marlin mine in the municipalities Sipakapa [3] and of San Miguel community, in the department of San Marcos. ACOGUATE accompanies since 2007 to organizations that defend the territory and denounce the negative impacts of mining in that area.

Rapporteur's visit in the country was requested by various organizations and communities who denounce human rights violations and the rights of indigenous peoples related to the use of natural resources (mining, construction of dams and other infrastructure, etc..), and the implementation of these projects without prior consultation with the affected populations. The culture and traditions of indigenous peoples marked the various visits that required an immense amount of movement by people and organizations. Participation was an important element of the visit, and that about 30,000 people in the worst affected areas of the country welcomed the Special Rapporteur participated in the activities and attended the speeches and testimonies.

Testimonials by people affected

Prior to her visits within the country, James Anaya held meetings in Guatemala City with representatives of state institutions [4 ] . Then, the UN independent expert visited several regions marked by high levels of social unrest related to mining: San Juan Sacatepéquez [5] (Department of Guatemala), San Miguel community (San Marcos) and Huehuetenango. Representatives by indigenous peoples' struggles to defend the territory, often referring to the Mayan worldview, and respect for Mother Earth and the ancestors. Reported in their speeches, the "neo-colonialism of transnational " and "mega-projects plunder their natural resources " [6] . They also insisted that their rights were being violated, such as the right to free, prior and informed about such projects in their territories, " may affect them directly " [7] . During his visit, the Special Rapporteur received direct testimony on the impacts of mining on health and social and environmental health: disease, pollution of rivers and arable land, damage or destruction of houses, land dispossession and forced removals , attacks, threats, harassment and even murder and rape and sexually abuse women, against those leaders and other community-as-as indigenous peasants to defend their rights. In San Miguel community, the affected population Anaya asked the UN to advocate for closing the Marlin mine. In addition, some evidence [8] focused on the strategies of deception Montana company, a subsidiary of the Canadian company Goldcorp Inc., as well as tissue destruction and peace community social-up in the same families, who come to build these mega projects.

Special Rapporteur's concerns about the situation of indigenous peoples and recommendations to the government

concluding his five-day mission in Guatemala, James Anaya said during a press conference in the capital and in its report of preliminary observations [9] his great concern about the situation of indigenous peoples " regarding activities the companies "even mining. He denounced "the climate high social instability and conflict in relation to the activities of companies in the traditional territories of indigenous peoples of Guatemala ." As for the persecution and criminalization of defenders and human rights, said: " the information that [has] received on the various judicial proceedings are open [and the speed with which these processes have taken place] against members of indigenous communities through acts of social protest against the activities of the companies are worrying " . Likewise, he stressed that " the apparent lack of response to the demands made by communities regarding acts violating their rights " could be interpreted as " a pattern of discrimination in access to justice ".

Recommendations to the State of Guatemala

In the legislative framework, James Anaya recommended the Guatemalan government for urgent progress towards the discussion and approval of the Measure of consultations, and " that is consistent with the minimum standards set by international standards and with the full participation of the peoples concerned ". Likewise insisted on the urgency of adopting a new mining law that will "fully integrate duties to the State under the protection of indigenous rights " [10] .

Moreover, recommended as an interim measure " the creation of institutionalized spaces for dialogue in which indigenous people can receive full and objective information on all aspects of the project that affect them and to clarify and communicate the state and the company its concerns ". As explained during his meetings with the population, he said to take seriously and be aware of the situation and expressed the wish to act within the limits of their role, for that is better. About the Marlin mine, said "the government of Guatemala [was] to fulfill its international obligations and abide by the resolutions the Commission. " These

preliminary observations will be developed in a final report submitted to the Human Rights Council United Nations and will include a series of recommendations to the State of Guatemala and other stakeholders.

" Before an extractive project that only bring negative impacts to affect the land they have always lived, leading to conflicts in my community, and that would not lead to any improvement in my condition of life, I would say no to mining "says UN Special Rapporteur in his report of preliminary observations [11] .

In recent months there has been a series of community consultations in the departments of Alta Verapaz, Quetzaltenango and Quiché. September 28 Lanquín municipality, Alta Verapaz, conducted a community consultation on hydropower projects, with the result of 14,065 votes against and 15 for [12] . October 20 held a consultation on mining in the municipality of Cabricán, Quetzaltenango, resulting in 13 610 people against, 73 in favor and 130 invalid votes; worth noting that unlike most of the consultations that have been done by show of hands, the process in the municipality of Cabricán used a voting system ballots [13] . Then, on Oct. 22 involving 27,776 people in the municipality of Santa Cruz del Quiche in a query that gave a unanimous result against mining [14] . A week later, on 29 October, held a consultation on the issues of mining and hydroelectric dams in the town Uspantan also Quiché department, with a preliminary result of over 27 000 votes against megaprojects [15] .


[1] American Indian origin, is the second Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous . N ombrado was in March 2008 by the Human Rights Council of the UN and hold that position for an initial period three years. Visit the website of the Special Rapporteur : http://www2.ohchr.org/spanish/issues/indigenous/rapporteur/index.htm and page of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in Guatemala: http://www.ohchr.org/SP/Countries/LACRegion/Pages/GTIndex.aspx .

[2] right to consultation of indigenous peoples, Article 6.1 Convention 169 of the International Labour Organization (ILO), ratified by Guatemala in 1996. See the ILO website: http://www.ilo.org/public/spanish/region/ampro/lima/publ/conv-169/convenio.shtml .

[3] In Sipakapa neighboring town of Marlin was held on June 18 passed the fifth anniversary of community consultation in good faith in which 45,738 people were against mining in their territory.

[4] Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (MARN), Ministry of Energy and Mines (MEM), Human Rights Ombudsman (PDH) and Presidential Commission for Coordinating Executive Policy on Human Rights (COPREDEH). In one such meeting, Sergio Morales (PDH) reminded him of the case against President Alvaro Colom for not having complied with the measures which the Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) had announced two weeks earlier. These measures aim to protect populations affected by the Marlin mine, demanding the suspension of its activities. See "Measures MC 260-07" in the website of the Commission: http://www.cidh.org/medidas/2010.sp.htm .

[5] municipalities affected by the cement company Cementos Progreso. Twelve communities were delivered in 2007 against this project through community consultation.

[6] Speeches on June 17, 2010, in the ruins of Zaculeu, Huehuetenango.

[7] See note 2.

[8] Video filmed in San Miguel with testimony on the subject in an article published on the website of the Pastoral Commission Peace and Ecology of the Diocese of San Marcos (COPAE):

http://www.resistencia-mineria.org/espanol/?q=node/288

[10] See footnote 9.

[11] See footnote 9.